While Africa’s value to the outside world has historically been framed largely in economic terms — as a place to extract resources and as a market to sell goods — China is changing that equation.
The fact is, Africa just isn’t that important to China economically. All 54 African countries combined account for less than 4% of China’s 4+ trillion global trade balance while Beijing still lags far behind the U.S., France, and others in terms of FDI.
Now, I know this is counterintuitive because 9.9 out of 10 people you meet who want to talk about the Chinese in Africa will almost always start the conversation by going on about Beijing’s appetite for natural resources or its ambitions to drown the continent in
unsustainable loans.
The fact is that most of the oil, timber, and minerals China buys from Africa (accounting for about 70% of all African exports), can now be sourced from dozens of other places along the Belt and Road. Take oil, for example. Former U.S. Ambassador and acclaimed China Africa scholar David Shinn highlights this trend by noting that in 2008 China imported 30% of its oil from African countries but by 2018 that number had fallen to just 18%. And as the Chinese become more reliant on Saudi and Iraqi oil, their dependence on African suppliers will continue to decline.
And what about all those loans that we’ve been talking about in such detail over the past several months? Sure, it’s a lot of money… but not really. Remember that we’re talking about $154 billion or so of outstanding loans in Africa for a Chinese economy worth around $13 trillion. Don’t get me wrong, these loans are important to the Chinese but if Africans can’t or don’t repay them it’s not going to hurt them in any meaningful way.
China’s new priorities in Africa are increasingly political, not economic. That 25 African countries signed on to the United Nations Human Rights Council statement supporting China’s position on the introduction of a new national security law in Hong Kong provides far more insight on what Beijing prioritizes today.
Consider how China is rallying African countries to support its controversial policies in Xinjiang, Taiwan, Tibet, the South China Sea, and, now, Hong Kong. Or, the fact that African countries are very comfortable telling the U.S. to go stu it when it comes to Huawei. Or, how African voting blocks are supporting Chinese candidates to run UN agencies.
Forget about commodities that the Chinese can pretty much buy anywhere, Beijing is instead of becoming more interested in Africa’s votes that bolster China’s global standing and support core strategic interests in its increasingly acrimonious stand-o with the U.S, Europe, and others.
The more pressing question now is whether African stakeholders fully appreciate that their political capital may actually be worth far more to the Chinese than all those raw materials they’ve been selling them for the past two decades?